Blaming Rap and Hip-Hop for Negative Messages free essay sample

Nation Does Hip-Hop music send a negative message to our youth? Well some people think It does and others think differently about It. I think It goes both ways and but Ill go more In detail In this essay. As far as I can remember, Hip-Hop music has ruled the Industry and continues to till this day. The negative part of rap music that people say sends a negative message is the lyrics. Some songs talk about killing, drugs and gang violence. Thats the part I dont care for but it sells so, itll continue to remain on top. Some music was blamed for shootings and some resulted in death. When it comes to violence, the Tuba and Baggy scandal comes to mind. This was labeled as an East and West coast war between the two. They both talked about killing each others families, having sex with each others wives, which lead to both of them being murdered (Dorian 2010). We will write a custom essay sample on Blaming Rap and Hip-Hop for Negative Messages or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Tuba had some great songs that hit home for some people. One that hit home for was Dear Mama, it talked about him growing up and how his mother made the best for him and his sister with what they had. I love when rappers speak from experience and in ways can influences people positively. A rapper by the name of Hurricane, tells his four kids that what they see and hear is just a record or video that was produced (Samuels 1995). I think its good for rappers to explain this issue with their kids. Itll give them a better understanding as they get older. Some of the negatives are when rappers get into trouble for drugs, murders and violations. Some kids look up to them as role models and when they see the trouble they get into they do the same or even worse. A lot of rappers stress to kids to stay in school and get an education. (Samuels 1995). Sometimes music is a way out for some people.A lot of rappers grew up in the hood and were In and out of trouble but used music as strength to get out. I think the media portrays It differently and blows rap music out of proportion, as they do everything. The media Is quick to put out the negative things but what about the positive things that they do. Some rappers give back and help out in any way they can. I Just read about rapper T. L. Talking some kid out of committing suicide. Thats definitely a highlight but I bet not too many people heard about It. In closing, I think rap music goes both ways as far as sending negative messages to our youth.

William Shakespeare Essays (1384 words) - Incidental Music, Prospero

William Shakespeare Essays (1384 words) - Incidental Music, Prospero William Shakespeare One may find it ridiculous to contrast between Shakespeare and existentialism in its 20th century form, however one must keep in mind, that existentialism does not appear as a single philosophical system. It is more an attitude of life, a general vision - existentialist Jean-Paul Sartre is known to have stated that existentialism was never invented, it has always existed as the ultimate foundation. Upon that light, why not seek the foundations from the work of the forefather of all dramatists? It is above all na?ve to claim Prospero?s Epilogue in Shakespeare?s play The Tempest a mere conventional appeal for applause or the stripping of the imaginary glamour built up by the plays magic. Even the greatest of artists would rather give away his life than surrender his art to be judged solely by the public. Art for an artistic genius is practised for its own sake; art for the purpose of art. Existence for the sake of existence itself - stripped of meaning, of value and of subjective interpretation. In its bear meaningless form, something still remains: the necessary Natural Law, a philosophical concept considered the basis of human well-being, a system of the values that determine human existence. Throughout The Tempest Prospero?s character portrays an image of a nearly Nietzchean superhuman capable of disclaiming authority, killing God. He is in control of every situation and event as if the chain of causes and effects would be a conductible melody waiting for an artist?s touch. On the other hand he is very human: a wronged duke and a father, a symbiosis which Shakespeare displayed with the use of Prospero?s garment as a theatrical tool. An artist is the creator, the maker of realities yet he remains human, an animal with feelings and urges, ties only waiting to be cut. The view implied is not far from the ideologies that emerged from the great suffering of the second world war: a man is capable of constructing himself a framework of personal and social meaning, but his true animal nature remains unchanged. In the heart of existence, life has no predefined meaning, it is a mere passage of survival from necessary birth to necessary death. Prospero's and his daughter's situation on the island was hopeless, however Prospero had chosen a function for his life - revenge. Prospero created a meaning for his life, built a synthetic reality to keep him sane on the path towards the finality of human death. Early existentialism begins to appear. The literatory image behind The Epilogue of The Tempest greatly involves the attitude and interpretation of art. Having constructed a window or more or less a door to an imaginary world for the audience, Shakespeare has succeeded in fusing art and reality. Upon that light it is incomprehensible to assume his need to address the subjective yet neutral third party, the audience - shatter the synthetic reality. However, The Epilogue is a beautiful and humble ending to a story filled with strong magical elements - the control is given to the audience, they are given Prospero?s magical garment. The passive third party is given a choice of interaction, chance to rise beyond spectatorship. An interesting aspect to The Epilogue of The Tempest is the fact that it was Shakespeare?s last play - the final words of a great artist. Due to the lack of historically trustworthy biographical information of Shakespeare?s character, it is difficult if not impossible to determine the effect of his life situation to the message itself. Whether justified or not, The Epilogue seems like a farewell - a humble artist handing over his life to the audience to which he has dedicated his entire life. When examining The Epilogue with the restriction of intertextuality, one is forced to focus on the character of Prospero. Why does he leave a farewell, why does he become the ultimate link from the world of the play to the world of the third party, the audience. His importance as the narrator of The Epilogue creates a third dimension to his character traits, he becomes the God-figure that seems limited to living on a island yet he can perform metaphysical leaps between dimensions. The person speaking is the author himself, for in

Significance of the Watergate Scandal Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Significance of the Watergate Scandal - Essay Example When it was later found out that the people were under the president’s payroll, the case led to his indictment. This was after running for re-election, in 1972, and winning. This paper will review the significance of this event, and some of the changes that followed in the U.S. policies after this event. It is true that this event shaped the country’s law after it erupted. Those involved were either directly or indirectly in the committee that was campaigning to re-elect the president. After all these events and the eventual resignation of the president, some changes in the laws were evident (Henretta and Jonathon 2009, 859). One of the changes that became clear to the people was the fact, â€Å"politicians could no longer be trusted.† This is what led to the election of a rather unknown party to be president. This was in the year 1977, when Jimmy Carter became president of the United States. The scandal gave the American people disillusionment about their govern ment. â€Å"It was during this period that people started having different thoughts about the war in Vietnam.† The president’s powers had to be curtailed due to the above reasons. They were curtailed in the sense that, the president had limited powers, especially when it came to matters concerning the state’s money, the deployment of troops to war, and the freedom to information. The National Congress was responsible for this move which was largely appreciated by the people in the United States. â€Å"The War Powers Act, reining on the president’s powers to deploy U.S. forces without congressional approval.† During this move, there was evidence that proved one thing; no one is above the law, not even the president. During the curtailing of the president’s powers, the freedom of the press got a new meaning (Henretta and Jonathon 2009, 860). All this was in the first amendment, in the constitution. If it is true, then, â€Å"it is the pressâ €™s responsibility to print it regardless of the position or power of those involved.† In another area, the Freedom of the Information Act became stronger. This meant, â€Å"People could now get access to government documents that are accessible to the public.† If the people of the state feel like they need to get information about some of the government’s activities, then it is possible to get documents with information (Henretta and Jonathon 2009, 860). These documents can let them know about what the government is about to do. If they happen to, â€Å"agree or disagree with any of their activities, it is their fundamental right to do so.† To date, government related documents are located online (Biagi 2011, 97). The internet can allow anyone, and everyone in the world to access government related documents. This is in order to find out what the powerful nation is doing, and if it is legal under the constitution. Through this event, the constitutionà ¢â‚¬â„¢s and people’s belief in the system was affirmed. â€Å"The belief of equality and justice became a reality to many.† It became evident even to the highest office in the land, that is, the president’s office. The people in the scandal got to understand the full extent of the law. It was while in office that the president operated on a level one would consider full of arrogance (Henretta and Jonathon 2009, 860). However, as the law demanded that they pay the price for their actions, they could no longer ignore the fact, â€Å"they were not above the law.†